Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ALtab's avatar

First, although I most assuredly would be on my face, I would truly welcome this. I appreciate this focus on messenger vs angel as it (to me) makes much more sense. The fact that these messengers are male is no surprise given God’s very specific about the ‘male’ role in mankind and as such, a ‘female’ messenger wouldn’t have credibility as she would be outside God’s defined role.

I’ve never been enamored with the focus on the (mythical) angels we see in society. I’m an artist and minored in art history in college. Angels are everywhere in all mediums of art throughout history, primarily during medieval times. Considering this in light of this article, concluding through research that the ‘dragon’ had been intimately involved with the Catholic faith from the very beginning; that much of the church tradition is pagan rituals included to bolster the spread of ‘religion’ and thus, generate more control and profit. Much of the totalitarianism we see today started with the church from the time of the persecution of the Cathars in France. Templars come to mind, too.

Today, the world’s believers in the Catholic faith have been duped through manipulation and sleight of hand into actually worshipping the evil one. Children are at the core of this evil. The ‘so-called ‘benevolent angels’ and what we’ve been programmed to see them as (cherubs and women primarily) in art is the opposite of how God describes the messengers.

What an enlightening article that has me (once again) revamping my perception of what God truly means when He teaches us the purpose of His messengers.

Thank you!! God bless.🙏🙏

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts